Saturday, March 18, 2006
prompted by the death of Anne Braden, July 28, 1924-March 6, 2006
Reflections of an aging soul from the “New Left”
“Who can fill her shoes?” That was what one of Anne Braden’s obituary writers asked, and he answered himself, “No one can, don’t even think about it.” Maybe he’s right, but I pray he is not, or God help us all. I believe the God who called and strengthened Anne, will indeed help us fill those shoes.
When I assigned the names “Carl and Anne Braden” as glossary entries to be identified for my class in Religion and Social Movements, I wondered if my students would be able to find anything. Silly me! I hadn’t “Googled” the names, or I wouldn’t have worried. You must forgive me, for you see, I was living the history now written about the Bradens when it wasn’t yet written, and it’s hard to think of it now as history, in the past, already summarized as an encyclopedia entry.
I’m glad it’s available. I’m glad to see how much is available. I knew the Braden’s papers were being left to libraries, and I trust scholars will pour over them at length, but as I read what is out there now, I think of so much more, so much that isn’t there, so much about Anne and Carl and about so many more like them.
I remember the way I felt when I first walked in their house. Looking around and seeing nothing but books. Books from floor to ceiling in every room, and stacked on the floor beside every chair. I remember the ubiquitous 3-by-5 index cards, the staple of every organizer’s trade in the days before computers and data bases. I remember realizing that Anne was too busy to clean house and knew what really mattered wasn’t the dust bunnies in the corners but the life and warmth in the rooms. I remember not yet thinking that Carl might be just as likely to clean house as Anne, or not. Feminism was only beginning to address housework when I met the Bradens.
I stand proudly as one of those aging radicals of the late sixties and early seventies who were the original “New Left,” knowing full well that we stood on the shoulders and had learned our craft from the veterans of the Old Left. I was part of the younger half of what my students now teach me is called “Second Wave Feminism,” and I’m still proud of it.
We women now in our fifties and sixties invented feminism all over again, out of our experiences in the civil rights and anti-war movements, when it had been long forgotten. And we did it in the same ways and from the same roots as the suffragists who invented “First Wave Feminism” out of their experiences in the abolition and temperance movements a century earlier.
I mourn today for the loss of Anne Braden, and for the losses of so many of the Old Left who made me who I am. They weren’t afraid to be called “communists,” and they refused to deny the name, even when they were not C.P. members themselves, out of solidarity with those who could not deny it because they were. They trusted us kids to carry on. They never allowed us to consider the possibility of NOT carrying on. The work was there to be done. Of course we would do it. How could we not?
The courageous crusaders of the Old Left knew their work was only the beginning, even while we of the giddy sixties thought the new day was dawning and the revolution was at hand. By observation we learned to do what we could not not do. We learned that when we did it, others called us “courageous,” just as we had seen our mentors in the Old Left as courageous. How strange to be called “courageous,” simply for doing what we couldn’t not do!
I have lost giants of my life already: Carl Braden, way too early, in 1975; Jim Dombrowski who raised money to fund my work in North Carolina and wrote me the most beautiful letters; Ralph Townsend of rural Michigan, who met Gandhi as a young man and then went to jail with me and to trial on conspiracy, as an old man, and his wife Mildred; Elmer Mass of New York City Plowshares community, who taught me so much about patience in the years we served together on the WRL NC; Igal Rodenko of the WRL, and then others I never met in person, Phil Berrigan, especially.
And we dread that so many more will be lost to us in the coming years; they are in their eighties and nineties and even saints don’t live forever. Will my generation measure up? Can we carry the burden? Dare we not?
In one of her last essays, Anne wrote, “If we are serious about the challenge of the unfinished business of racism, we must start by realizing that this is not a task we must complete. It is one we must begin” (Fellowship Magazine, Jan-Feb 2005). How humbling to realize that a veteran of anti-racism campaigns going back six decades still saw the task as only just beginning. God willing, we aging radicals of the New Left will finally see the task begun. Perhaps our children can see it through to its end.
7:58 pm cst, Omaha, Nebraska, March 18, 2006